Just what is a good school!?
Monday, 01 March 2010 23:00

Martin Montgomery is a youth worker in Banbridge, he is currently studying for a masters in inclusion and diversity and gives his views here on the academic selection debate which is sweeping our wee country...
Read on and give your views on his take on this complex issue...
With 50% of our young people leaving school without GCSE English or Mathematics, and young protestant boys from working class backgrounds becoming the largest group currently marginalised by the education system, I find myself asking what the church I work for, and worship in, has to say about this. When I say Church I mean my church leaders and to that end I have written an email to the Board of Education asking them for a response on the issues this article raises.
I am aware that the Board of Education along with other religious denominations seek to find a way through the current education impasse surround academic selection. With the Catholic church today coming out in favour of scrapping academic selection, this has provoked a response from the DUP. Peter Robinson claims grammer schools and academic selection must be maintained - however I wonder whose view he thinks he is representing? Indeed whose views do the Church of Ireland represent?
The young people who are being failed by the system are protestants, (probable) DUP constituents, which is why I am confused about the DUP's stance in this debate. When it comes to schooling the voice which shouts loudest is listened to in the corridors of power; the young person may not be this voice, yet they have a right to be heard. The complexity comes in when young people who have felt needs, conflict with parents who have expectations for their child. Unfortunately the cynic in me tells me the one who can vote wins the argument with the MLA's everytime. The DUP is dependant on these votes to succeed in the polls, therefore their policies may not be totally beneficial for the child who sits at the centre of this argument.
I doubt the parents of those children who are cast aside by an education system focused on results would agree with Mr Robinson, put yourself in their situation. What opinion would you have? If you're a grammar school parent or pupil, then perhaps you think the system works, but if you're not, then perhaps you think it's a story of the have's and the have nots. This brings us back to the central question of what defines a good school. Results alone can not be the answer as this tried and tested method simply increases the extremes between academic excellence and failure.
I feel I need to make it clear that I am not criticising teachers or front-line staff, the system they are subjected to and judged by restricts them to viewing young people as targets, the system needs to change to respect young people as individuals with real felt needs which both enable and prevent them to achieve in life. My question is - are we as a church failing them by not advocating on their behalf for a fairer education system? Do congregations within the C of I even realise the impact of remaining silent or neutral on this issue?
The attitude towards grammer schools and the education system is either extreme naivity (indeed complacency) - 'Served me well, and good schools are schools with good results' or extreme hurt and failure of being let down by the system and those who live with the consequence of this - usually marginalisation, little opportunity for employment leading to low aspirations and ultimately resulting in poverty which completes the vicious circle.
As a youth worker I have a vested interested in knowing where my church stands on this issue. Are we as a powerful institution who sit on various school boards and policy making institutions through our Board of Ed. actively and theologically taking a considered approach to this issue?
I would be interested to know if church seeks to educate those who sit on Boards of Governors in schools on the wider implications of pushing a results driven agenda in primary and post primary schools which judges young people solely on academic results. This narrow focus leads to our educational establishments dividing into those who educate future doctors, lawyers and professionals from those who educate future mechanics, cleaners and shelf stackers at age 11!
We as a church must be inclusive of every child and be careful not to maintain the status quo. Indeed at this critical time in our countries history regarding shaping education for future generations, we have a unique opportunity to speak out against marginalisation of young people which academic selection can contribute to, and advocate for those most in need of fair education system believing in the potential for every young person to develop and grow in a holistic way; not simply focussing on getting a grade A where they were once sitting on a B.
Think of it like this, in a grammer school where results dictate success, will a school pump money into supporting a child on a U to try to achieve a grade E, or will they try to get the D grade child to a C? When results are key, the U grade child gets sidelined. This is unacceptable and conditions the U grade child to accept their lot - where is the important life lesson on aspiration and potential being taught here?

I do understand NI has some of the best GCSE results in the UK, however we are a country of extremes, meaning we are also the country most likely to fail young people in helping them achieve any GCSE's at all. Ignoring this inequality is surely a dereliction of our theological imperative to bring sight to the blind. If we can't even bring, or even advocate an equitable education system to our own young people, then we are in real trouble both in terms of caring for our children, and in front of our God who places this responsibility upon us.
Martin Montgomery
Youth Pastor - Seapatrick Parish Church
The views represented in this article may not represent those held by DDYC.





Comments
1. Is it possible that an attempt at inclusive education (doing away with grammar schools and high schools) in terms of academic selection might indeed go some way to reducing the apparent academic divide, but pull in the extremes of the bell curve at both ends, resulting in an education system where genuine excellence cannot be marked? For that matter, wouldn't the needs of a mid-level student be better served in an academically focussed environment surrounded by fellow pupils whose academic success may help to call them on further? Might there be an argument for better opportunities at vocational education and a broader educational base but not at the expense of grammar schools?
2. Can the Church of Ireland rightly articulate a position on this matter theologically given the undoubted breadth of personal and theological opinion that must (by law of averages) exist among its membership?
I agree with you Martin, that what we have at the moment is not sufficient. But I guess if I had all the answers I'd be earning mroe money!
On a not directly related note - is it healthy in Northern Ireland to have two parallel educational systems segregated on the grounds of religion?
Thanks for raising these questions Martin - it's good to have a look at issues like this.
I definitely think our segregated school system is a massive contributory factor to maintaining sectarianism. However that is a separate issue.
Quote:
The fundamental issue I have with this argument is the assumption that schools are designed to produce academic excellence. I am not naive to think that results don’t matter. Indeed I am arguing for a broader understanding of success!
The markers we use to judge this success is results, and while they do indicate academic ability for universities and employers of certain professions, there surely needs to be a more encompassing understanding of what achievement means for individual young people.
Traditionally grammar schools are the places seen as the place to get the best results, and they evidence it is not these young people who we must worry about. It is the ones who go to the other high schools - now you may be worried about the impact of amalgamation on the higher achievers, however this is an unfounded fear. You suggest lower performers can be inspired by higher achievers – and I am saying the same, but I believe this opportunity should extend to what is lazily seen as the 'lower achievers'.
Aspiration and potential are values and principles every young person has a right to be surrounded by. Currently some young people, usually the most marginalised and at risk of exclusion are denied this through the education system we promote.
This in my opinion is what is known as institutional sin. The Stephen Lawrence enquiry once described the Met police as institutionally racist after the system let down one young man, even while protecting many others; I am laying a comparative claim at our educational system. The system tells certain young people at age 11, where they will most likely end up at age 18. It denies the opportunity to excel and develop to some simply through academic selection. This cannot be either morally or theologically just.
I do agree that the church is broad theologically, however we surely all agree in equality of opportunity. Perhaps I am living a pipe dream, but I do think we as a church should not be supporting inequality, indeed inclusion on many different levels seems to be the buzz word at meetings like synod etc...
Excellence of any and all standards can be achieved in a school of all abilities. My limited experience tells me this; I went to Lurgan Junior High school, where there was a top middle and lower banding for pupils – only at 3rd year were we divided into the grammar and high school educational paths. During the 3 years in LJH, I never felt restricted by others who were lower ability than me.
Of course it’s not that black and white, but there is an important lesson in there.
The current education system not only caters for, but reinforces and continues to produce the have’s and the have not’s in our society. This must stop – the academic excellent will always excel (teachers love the high achievers) – the middle achievers will always need a push (teachere love to see a mid leveler achieve), but for those who are seen as failing students, those teachers label as lazy or too difficult – surely we have a moral, ethical and (I’ll say it again) theological duty to offer them more than they currently get now.
In my opinion we need to view the U students in the same light as the grade A students – not defined by results, but assessed individually through a (multi-disciplinary) education system adapting to meet those needs.
Thanks for taking the time to reply!
RSS feed for comments to this post.